Experienced advice.
A practical perspective.
Our perspective comes from decades of designing, building, and operating systems. We bring that experience to the choices your business faces today.
Founded in 2010, MoreDevs brings together experience in architecture, engineering, and operations to help clients work through complex technology challenges.
Our work has spanned products, operational platforms, backend systems, and integrations for international clients. That hands-on foundation informs our consulting: recommendations account for how a system will be built, used, maintained, and changed over time.
Technology decisions have consequences beyond the technology.
An architecture choice can affect the pace of product change, the work of an operations team, and the cost of maintaining a system for years.
We help connect those consequences to the decision in front of you. Working with your team, we question assumptions, explain alternatives, and shape an approach that fits your circumstances.
Decades of experience inform the questions we ask and the advice we give.
Mihai Dima
CO-FOUNDER25+ years building production systems end-to-end — from architecture through deployment and scaling. Co-founded two software companies, scaled engineering teams past 15 developers, and delivered across connected-device platforms, insurance, financial data processing, and EDI. Currently building AI-powered applications with multi-agent architectures.
Eugen Vasilian
CO-FOUNDER25+ years in technical architecture, enterprise delivery, and operations management. Built and scaled engineering teams and delivered complex solutions for clients across Europe and the US in healthcare, energy, marketing technology, and industrial manufacturing.
We ask what needs to change for the business and what is getting in the way before exploring the technical options.
We explain why we recommend an approach, which assumptions it depends on, and what trade-offs come with it.
We account for the people who will operate, maintain, and evolve the system after the initial work is complete.
When an important decision rests on an assumption, we look for a practical way to investigate it before committing further.
Hands-on involvement helps us check that recommendations remain useful as implementation reveals new constraints.